The Queen of Warmongers has spoken.

Mrs Clinton went on MSNBC [read: CIAtv] to encourage the #BlobMOB to oppress and suppress the free speech rights of Fellow Americans who she has deemed literal traitors for not toeing the War Party’s line.


Laurence Tribe (a widely respected constitutional law expert who now works for Bill Kristol’s NeoCon rag, The Bulwark) was one of the original propagators of the #WarPropaganda campaign that calls for people who counter the Warmonger narrative to be *literally* arrested for treason. He even armed people with a dubious legal argument for it.


His comment kept me up for a few nights… because he sometimes name-drops Merrick Garland, as if he has our Attorney General’s ear. I was also astounded that he, who was once known as a *sound* realist, had gone full NeoCon.

Professor Tribe deleted his Tweet, but not before it laid the groundwork for war propaganda espoused by Women Consensus Builders of The View, who asserted that to go against the Warmongers is to “aid and abet, and give comfort to the enemy”. And I guess we’re supposed to be cool with this authoritarian rubbish, because it supposedly only hurts “people on the right”.

The View also established *how* people are allegedly “aiding and abetting, and giving comfort to the enemy”: Counter-narratives are supposedly being broadcast by Russian media (Hillary repeats this line), thus providing Putin with propaganda to “bolster” Russia’s cause.

Orders for this attack against independent journalists and common citizens who question the state approved narrative, and who share a bigger picture of this war (in pursuit of the whole truth and practical solutions that could prevent this war, originated from the White House. At the time, they were attempting to silence anyone who was sounding alarm bells about how Ukraine’s provocative behavior could trigger World War III.

White House launches preemptive strike against Truth, calls for bullying of independent minded journalists who counter war propaganda.

They sit there, with their smug faces, telling us that our own democracy depends on defending democracy abroad… but their strategy for “defending democracy abroad” includes suppressing freedoms at home.



Originally published on Twitter.

Please watch this documentary about how the elites create fake realities to keep the war machine on life support. What they’re doing with Putin now, is what they did with Gaddafi before.

You don’t have to like Putin to understand that Anti-Putinism is being used to manipulate us into mindless savagery.

When hate for Putin overrides love of country, and you’re willing to throw our country under the bus just to spite Putin, it’s time to hit the brakes. People are now willing to take nukes up the arse, just to show Putin how tough we are.

Ukraine declared war on Russia in March, 2021, and people should stop ignoring this.

People keep saying that NATO is not an issue, and that Putin is using an imagined NATO threat as a pretext for war. But in March 2021, Zelenskyy signed an executive order (known broadly as the Crimea Platform) to “deoccupy” the Donbas, Crimea, and Sevastopol (Home of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet), by military means if necessary, and the document’s outlined strategy included obtaining NATO membership… something that Zelenskyy’s administration previously said would trigger an attack from Russia.

Putin has mentioned this executive order in his speeches, but our leaders and their talking heads keep ignoring this integral part of the war.

Zelenskyy has even gone as far as threatening to arm Ukraine with nuclear bombs if we don’t expedite Ukraine’s NATO membership. His justification for this political blackmail: Repeating the false claim that since Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons, we are obligated to defend their territory, and if we won’t, they should nuke up. But no such agreement was made in the Budapest Memorandum. The agreement was that we would seek assistance and action, from the United Nations Security Council, if Ukraine is ever threatened with *nuclear* weapons.

Since this EO was issued, instigators, spectators, and backers of war have been doing all they can to frame Russia as the aggressor, done all they can to convince our leaders to launch a preemptive first-strike, and done all they can to provoke, dare, and double-dare Russia into launching a preemptive first-strike of their own.

Zelenskyy’s March 2021 EO was a declaration of war against Russia, and Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba doubled down on it, as he stood shoulder to shoulder with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in January, and said that the “conflict” with Russia won’t end until Russia abandons the Donbas, Crimea, and Sevastopol.

As far as why Zelenskyy would make such a bold declaration… that’s a good question, well worth exploring.

The United States should disavow Ukraine’s Crimea Platform, and condemn it as a threat to global peace.

Our leaders and their talking heads keep ignoring these provocations, on Ukraine’s part, that triggered the current war. Zelenskyy’s EO was a violation of international law, and we should not be supporting Ukraine in a war that they started. Instead of beefing up Ukraine’s military, rewarding their bad behavior with NATO membership, and further emboldening escalations, we should be encouraging Zelenskyy to negotiate for resolution and peace, and to learn to get along with Russia peaceably. We should also acknowledge and address Russia’s legitimate security concerns.

A neutral Ukraine is the only path to peace, and anything else moves us closer to a global war.


“Why is the Biden Administration Pushing Ukraine to Attack Russia?” By Ron Paul

Trouble Waters in the Black Sea (Timeline of Escalations).

UPDATE: Two days after this post was published, Russia launched an attack against Ukraine, while simultaneously conducting a military intervention in the Donbas. Russia’s president described the military operation as a preemptive measure taken to prevent having to go to war with NATO.

Zelenskyy should abandon the Crimea Platform and rescind his declaration of war, before he gets more of his people killed.

Minsk II Agreements (full text)


Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements

February 12, 2015

  1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation as of 15 February 2015, 12am local time.
  2. Withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides by equal distances in order to create a security zone of at least 50km wide from each other for the artillery systems of caliber of 100 and more, a security zone of 70km wide for MLRS and 140km wide for MLRS Tornado-S, Uragan, Smerch and Tactical Missile Systems (Tochka, Tochka U):

    -for the Ukrainian troops: from the de facto line of contact;

    -for the armed formations from certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine: from the line of contact according to the Minsk Memorandum of Sept. 19th, 2014;

    The withdrawal of the heavy weapons as specified above is to start on day 2 of the ceasefire at the latest and be completed within 14 days.

    The process shall be facilitated by the OSCE and supported by the Trilateral Contact Group.

  3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire regime and the withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from day 1 of the withdrawal, using all technical equipment necessary, including satellites, drones, radar equipment, etc.
  4. Launch a dialogue, on day 1 of the withdrawal, on modalities of local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine “On interim local self-government order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions” as well as on the future regime of these areas based on this law.

    Adopt promptly, by no later than 30 days after the date of signing of this document a Resolution of the Parliament of Ukraine specifying the area enjoying a special regime, under the Law of Ukraine “On interim self-government order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions”, based on the line of the Minsk Memorandum of September 19, 2014.

  5. Ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting the law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine.
  6. Ensure release and exchange of all hostages and unlawfully detained persons, based on the principle “all for all”. This process is to be finished on the day 5 after the withdrawal at the latest.
  7. Ensure safe access, delivery, storage, and distribution of humanitarian assistance to those in need, on the basis of an international mechanism.
  8. Definition of modalities of full resumption of socio-economic ties, including social transfers such as pension payments and other payments (incomes and revenues, timely payments of all utility bills, reinstating taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine).

    To this end, Ukraine shall reinstate control of the segment of its banking system in the conflict-affected areas and possibly an international mechanism to facilitate such transfers shall be established.

  9. Reinstatement of full control of the state border by the government of Ukraine throughout the conflict area, starting on day 1 after the local elections and ending after the comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions on the basis of the Law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) to be finalized by the end of 2015, provided that paragraph 11 has been implemented in consultation with and upon agreement by representatives of certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group.
  10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under monitoring of the OSCE. Disarmament of all illegal groups.
  11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with a new constitution entering into force by the end of 2015 providing for decentralization as a key element (including a reference to the specificities of certain areas in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with the representatives of these areas), as well as adopting permanent legislation on the special status of certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in line with measures as set out in the footnote until the end of 2015.
  12. Based on the Law of Ukraine “On interim local self-government order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions”, questions related to local elections will be discussed and agreed upon with representatives of certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. Elections will be held in accordance with relevant OSCE standards and monitored by OSCE/ODIHR
  13. Intensify the work of the Trilateral Contact Group including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the Trilateral Contact Group.

Such measures, in accordance with the Law “On the special order of local government in individual areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions,” include the following:

– Exemption from punishment, harassment and discrimination of persons associated with the events that took place in individual areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions;

– The right to self-determination with regard to language;

– Participation of local governments in the appointment of heads of prosecutors’ offices and courts in individual areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions;

– The possibility for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with the relevant local authorities on economic, social and cultural development of individual areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions;

– The state shall support socio-economic development of individual areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions;

– Assistance from the central government to cross-border cooperation between the individual areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and regions of the Russian Federation;

– The creation of people’s militia units [police] upon the decision of local councils in order to maintain public order in individual areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions;

– The powers of local council deputies and other officials elected in snap elections, appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine according to this law, cannot be terminated.

Mediation by representatives of France and Germany, under the Normandy Format.

Written, agreed to, and signed by members of the Trilateral Contact Group (TCP):

Swiss Ambassador, Heidi Tagliavini
Second President of Ukraine, L. D. Kuchma
Russian Ambassador to Ukraine, M. Yu. Zurabov
Donetsk Rep, A.W. Zakharchenko
Luhansk Rep, I.W. Plotnitski


Obstacles to implementing Minsk Protocols are a matter of interpretation.

This post was rolled from Twitter, with errors and Tweetspeak left intact. Join the conversation here.

Results of yesterday’s Normandy format meeting: Reaffirming Minsk II protocols. Agreeing to use the Normandy format to resolve issues. “Unblocking” (restarting) Trilateral Contact Group work. The TCG serves as mediators between the Donbas, Kyiv, & Russia.…

The readout from the Ukrainian government also says that Ukraine is committed to resolving current conflicts with diplomacy and “political” solutions (meaning, not militarily).

The Russian readout says there were differences that were not solved, about how Minsk agreements should be interpreted.…

Details were not given about what those differences were. Historically, Russia has resisted the idea that they should play a role in the Donbas, while Ukraine has tried to make them play the role of guarantor of separatists’ actions…

Russia’s official position, is that it is a civil war between Ukraine and their own people. Ukraine (and the West), however, insist that the war is between Kyiv and Russian proxies.

The longstanding disagreement of how Minsk protocols should be interpreted are outlined here… from the anti-Russia point of view.…

Besides disagreement about whether the conflict is a civil war, or a war between Ukraine and Russian proxies, there is disagreement about what “Special Status” is. The Ukr-West view, is that “Special Status” is undefined and could mean anything…

Russia’s view, is that Special Status + Decentralization (which Minsk *does* call for), means autonomy.

The Ukr-West view: Ukraine can’t move further in their part of the agreement until “the Russians” are all out of the Donbas. By “the Russians” they mean Russian proxies… which really means, all the people who live there.…

All the people who live there, because in the Ukr-West’s view, what’s happening is not a civil war… it’s a war between Ukraine and Russia, and everyone in the Donbas who is on the side of the rebels are Russian proxies.

If you think about it… since a lot of *ethnic* Russians live there, Putin’s ethnic cleansing allegation against Ukraine has some merit, since the UN’s definition of ethnic cleansing includes displacement of a People by force or threat of force.…

Fake Maternity Leave for All

Other countries call what Bernie Sanders is pretending to do, “Maternity Leave“. And, no. I’m not ‘satisfied’ with the fact that our country doesn’t give women enough paid maternity leave… but neither does his stupid bill.

Women should be given at least a year, and as much as two years, in government sponsored/protected maternity leave/accommodations, to give us enough time to heal from the trauma of birth, to nurse our babies, and because it has been proven that mother-baby separation during the first two years of life is psychologically damaging for children.

We’ve been fighting for this for decades. Instead, we’ve ended up with… 4 weeks? Which is less than what most of us already have. And, why? So other parental units, who do not share our unique and inherent issues, can share the benefit, equally? So men people with dicks can stop crying about how #WOMYN are granted special privileges because of their vaginas?

This is just one more reason why we shouldn’t let legislators adopt this stupid delusion that differences in biological sex don’t exist. Women didn’t come all this way just to go back to having our *unique* issues ignored. Did we?

Pardon me. I guess I should’ve said, birthing-menstruators-who-chestfeed-newborn-progeny… aka, “Breeders”.

Of course, there are economic factors that need to be considered, but that part of the issue deserves its own, separate debate… and we can’t move on to that part of the maternity leave argument, until we settle this one.

The Blob’s new Domino Theory has nothing to do with saving “democracy”.

This post was rolled from Twitter, with errors and Tweetspeak left intact. Join the conversation here.

Twitterverse (@girly_GRRRL) — Fukuyama seems to think that Americans should be willing to go to war with Russia over Ukraine, because if Ukraine is taken over by Russia, its “struggling democracy” will fail, and America’s democracy will fall as well:…

I would argue that America is quickly slipping into authoritarianism, all on its own accord… and largely due to the Blob’s effort to preserve public support for NeoCon Doctrine… which has bled our country dry with #ForeverWar.

I would also argue that the survival of America’s Liberal Democracy does not depend on the success of Ukraine’s “democracy”… but the legitimacy of NeoCon Doctrine does.

I would conclude that NeoCon Doctrine is a failed policy that should be abandoned. It has not produced one single success, and has only made the world less safe for us all. It does the opposite of what it has promised, and is turning America into the Baddies.

Learn more about the Bush Doctrine of Preemption:…

Analysis ≠ Evidence

This post was rolled from Twitter, with errors and Tweetspeak left intact. Join the conversation here.

Twitterverse (@girly_GRRRL) — I hate to think that it’s possible, but I think there’s a good chance that the USIC is basing their “intel” about Russia’s Ukraine invasion plans on a conspiracy theory that the Bild wrote. The Bild is a tabloid rag, on par with the US National Inquirer.…

The Bild even says that there’s no evidence that Russia intends to invade Ukraine, but speculate about how, “… *if* they do, this is probably how they’re going to do it.”

WaPo’s piece about the planned Russian invasion echoes what the Bild wrote. It also states that the “analysis” is “based in part” on satellite photos showing Russian troop movements, which Ukraine officials say demonstrate “rehearsal” of an invasion.

Russia routinely runs military readiness exercises. This is nothing new. & every time they do, ppl speculate about how Russia is “staging for invasion”. What is new, is the way the exec branch is now acting like the war gossip is “credible intel”.…

The people who peddle this rubbish claim they want to deter war, but their speculation may serve, instead, as a self-fulfilling prophecy that ends up *provoking* war… especially since they advocate for us to respond to their fantasies with pre-emptive (first-strike) measures.

Unless the American people want to spend the next decade fighting another devastating global war, we must stop indulging NeoCon fantasies.

Why the CIA hates Tulsi Gabbard.

This post was rolled from Twitter, with errors and Tweetspeak left intact. Join the conversation here.

(Updated on 14 March 2022, with info about Clint Watts.)

A large number of people were dissuaded from @TulsiGabbard because she kept telling us that the “rebels” our CIA was providing aid and comfort to were al-Qaeda (our only declared enemy). We were told that she was spreading treasonous lies, but people are now learning that what she’s been saying is true.

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the primary swiftboaters, who try to make @TulsiGabbard look like a traitor and “Russian asset” for calling out the CIA’s dirty deeds in Syria, are former CIA agents and their cohorts.

People like Clint Watts, who accused her of lying about our government’s covert Ops to back al-Qaeda…

… even though he personally think-tanked this dumb ass policy.

And people like Evan McMullin, who was instrumental in putting this scheme into play by organizing the dubious Caesar Torture Photos used to get congress onboard.

McMullin’s version of truth: The al-Qaeda guys the CIA works with are the good guys… cuz they’re fighting the bad guys for us.

McMullin’s version of truth: The good al-Qaeda terrorists, who we pay and give guns to, are now “rebels”. All the bad ones are now ISIS…

… and anyone who says otherwise is an Assad loving, Putin stooge.

👆🏽 CIA talking points.

Note from the date, Evan started this propaganda campaign against Tulsi before she even made that controversial trip to Syria, and long before she even became a candidate for the 2020 presidency.

CIA talking points:

Read More:

Does the CIA and our USIC even work for America anymore? It doesn’t look like it to me… especially since they’re so willing and eager to throw a proven patriot under the bus to protect their al-Qaeda friends.

Why the CIA hates @TulsiGabbard:


Read More About: Lies of Mass Destruction — Ghouta, Syria