Permanently Suspended from Twitter

By Na'omi Allen
Mrs Allen is a disgruntled American veteran and this is her personal blog. She studies geopolitical phenomena, with a focus on countering contemporary Nazism.

Well… it was only a matter of time, I guess? My Twitter account has been permanently suspended for a supposed “ban evasion”, even though I have never been banned from Twitter before, and not a single Tweet from @NaomiAllen_USA has been successfully reported for a TOS violation!

There was that one time when I got temporarily thrown in Twitter jail for calling Whoopi Goldberg a wench, but that was on a different account that I eventually did lose access to… but not due to a TOS suspension (I’m somewhat of a boomer about social media and forgot to update my details when I changed my email address and cellphone number).

Furthermore… while I await the outcome of my appeal and am attempting to archive some of my Twitter rants, I’ve noticed that my threads are being edited and some of my Tweets have been deleted!

Coincidentally, I was Tweeting about #OperationMockingbird, and NAFO was mass reporting me for “hate speech” when I received my suspension notice. Advocating against contemporary Nazism and exposing the Holodomor as Goebbels’ propaganda that was designed to provoke and justify the Holocaust is now considered to be hate crimes in today’s America.

My appeal to Twitter Support:

I have concluded after some investigation that I was arbitrarily mass reported by NAFO, and that this resulted in my suspension. I have repeatedly reported this troll farm for harassing me on Twitter and you guys barely do anything about this problem, and their harassment continues with impunity. It appears that they reported me for hate speech, whenever I mention Ukrainian Nazism. Ukrainian Nazism is an actual problem that needs to be part of the public conversation. I do not, in any way, say or imply that ALL Ukrainians are Nazis. I am also being accused of “denying genocide” which I never do. I do talk about how the Holodomor narrative was crafted by Goebbels (a FACT) in order to provoke WW2 Ukrainian Nazis into committing the Holocaust, and this is an important issue that must not be suppressed. My account has been unfairly suspended, and I am requesting that it be restored.

Evidence of my being targetted for harassment attached, and I’ve archived how these guys are celebrating the results:

“Vatnik Down!”

To be clear: While many of the NAFO Trolls are posting “receipts” of successfully reported Tweets, Twitter has not sent me a single notification about these alleged violations. The only reason I was given for a permanent suspension was supposed ban evasion, and they have not identified a single offensive Tweet from me.

I’ve also discovered that the NAFO Troll Farm is in contact with Twitter insiders who are in positions to suspend accounts at will.

On top of this, I am now being harassed on SubStack, my email inbox is flooded with fake news subscription spam, they’re plotting to harass me on Telegram if I start participating there, and they are intent on making sure I can never monetize my content.

All this means, for me, is that I’ll be blogging more and will have to get my shy ass in gear and start a podcast to talk about all the things that the Powers-That-Be and their NAFO Troll Farm don’t want me talking about. I refuse to be silenced, and the suppression campaign that’s been launched against me only strengthens my resolve.

Unroll: Ukraine is not a legitimate state. #DonbassLivesMatter

Originally published on Twitter:

In a recent speech to the UN, Joe Biden condemned Russian mobilization to East Ukraine and called upcoming Donbass referendums a “sham”. Our President shamelessly ignores the plight of Donbass. He pretends that Putin is “needlessly” defending the Donbass, even tho Ukrainian forces were bombing the hell out of them. Does Donbass not have the right to defend themselves?

I am not asking rhetorically. I really want to know why our president @POTUS @JoeBiden doesn’t believe that Donbass has a right to defend themselves.

Putin doesn’t just have the moral high ground in the fight against modern day Nazis. He also has legal standing for Russia’s SMO to protect Donbass and Russian soil. By hindering their right to self-defense, it’s our country that is in violation of international law right now.

Originally published on Twitter:

Timothy Snyder proposes that Donbass referendums should be referred to as “obscenity” and “element of war crime.” But I call their right to self-determination a matter of survival for East Ukrainians. #DonbassLivesMatter

Since 2014, we have been told that the reason why Ukraine refuses to recognize any referendum held by Donbass, is because they were occupied by Russia. The consensus is that it is illegal for any type of voting to happen in occupied territory…

… because those people would be under the threat of violence and would not be voting their conscience. This is something I used to believe… until realized that Russia was *not* “occupying” the Donbass all these years.

The Rus Fed military didn’t even have a meaningful presence in Donbass until this year. But today… even with their troops being there, it still shouldn’t be considered a military occupation…

According to international law, “… territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.”

LDPR has not been placed under Rus Fed authority, or under the authority of the Russian military. LDPR leaders are in charge of their respective self-declared republics.

The Russian Federation is not hostile to these self-declared republics.

There is a Russian military presence, but it is there at the request of LDPR leaders. Russia’s boots on the ground there does not fit the legal definition of a military occupation.

If Professor Snyder were to look at the situation honestly, he would have to come to the same conclusion. Instead, he side-steps and claims that nobody should even try to argue the legality of a referendum. Of course… if they did, they would lose that legal argument.

He claims: We should not call it an “illegal” referendum, because doing so recognizes that a referendum is/will happen, and whatever happens should not be recognized as a referendum at all.

Rhetoric of Criminality: A persuasive argument that makes no sense and is not based on fact but convinces people of dumb shit. Aka, anything that comes out of Professor Snyder’s mouth lately.

An old argument that I haven’t seen raised this time around: They’d have to hold a referendum in accordance with the Ukrainian constitution, and what Donbass would be doing, doesn’t.

I used to believe this, too. Until I realized that Ukraine has not had a legitimate constitution since 2014.

Technically, Ukraine is no longer a legitimate state, and hasn’t been since the Euromaidan overthrew the government and illegally messed with their constitution (making changes to it, without holding a national referendum, which their former constitution required them to do).

Unroll: Ukraine is not winning.

Originally published on Twitter.

I agree w/ this. If you look at the conflict as if Ukraine is the real aggressor (they are), and examine their mission goals (regaining their 2013 territories), Ukraine is losing this war, big time.

Ukraine has failed to take back Crimea or the very small span of territory that Donbass “rebels” held. They’ve lost ALL but one small village in Lugansk Oblast, a huge swathe of Donetsk Oblast, and they lost control over two more oblasts (Kherson and Zaporizhzhia).

Pre-SMO Ukraine:

Ukraine, Today:

Plus, a new rebellion has started in Odessa Oblast (a prized territory that they previously were not in danger of losing)… and this rebellion has declared a manifesto that isn’t about secession or a desire for autonomy, but challenges the legitimacy of the Kiev regime.

Ukraine’s ruling regime really is *losing* this battle.

They should have implemented Minsk Accords. Had they done so, they would not have lost a single square foot of territory outside of Crimea. Not implementing Minsk was a stupid move.

« Previous PageNext Page »