Unroll: Why Merck sabotaged their own Ivermectin product.

Well. This explains the propaganda campaign against Ivermec. Pfizer and Merck have partnered to provide us with Molnupiravir.

Pfizer, Merck start testing COVID prevention pills in late-stage trials
The drugs, each given orally as a pill, would provide an unprecedented COVID-19 preventive medication option if brought to market.

Molnupiravir does what Ivermec does: Inhibits replication of an RNA virus, although it uses a different mechanism. Ounce per ounce comparison: Molnupiravir has stronger viral suppression for a shorter amount of time. Ivermec has weaker suppression, for a longer amount of time.

Read More: austinpublishinggroup.com/pharmacology-t…

Ivermec works by preventing an RNA virus from penetrating a cell (infection) where it can gather materials to reproduce itself. Molnupiravir works by damaging a virus’s nucleus, so it can’t reproduce.

The active ingredient in M: N4-hydroxycytidine, is controversial. It would have never gotten FDA approval for human clinical studies if it weren’t for our covid “emergency”.

Read More: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33961695/

β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Through Lethal Mutagenesis But Is Also Mutagenic To Mammalian Cells – PubMed

Mutagenic ribonucleosides can act as broad-based antiviral agents. They are metabolized to the active ribonucleoside triphosphate form and concentrate in genomes of RNA viruses during viral replicatio…https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33961695/

Straight up, you guys… Ivermec does the same fricken thing Molnupiravir would, but through a method that is KNOWN to be safe for us. It’s why front line workers around the world are using it as a prophylactic and PREP, to protect themselves in high exposure environments.

I really have found no proof that Ivermec works to cure/treat systemic COVID, but it has worked in ALL of the cohort studies I’ve read, as a PREP and prophylactic. Cohort studies: Healthcare workers doing their own studies because the “experts” refuse to do it officially.

The NIH, FDA, and CDC are supposedly looking to see if Ivermec works to “treat” COVID. I expect those studies to fail, and it will be used to discredit the product. But “treatment” is not what this drug is ideal for…

It stops replication. If too much time has passed and the disease is already systemic, there is already too much of the virus in the system for the drug to be used effectively at a safe dose. That it won’t “treat or cure” COVID is a straw man. It’s not what we should fight for, with Ivermec.

We should demand that Ivermec be tested as a prophylactic and PREP, not a “treatment”. Problem: Ivermec is made by Merck, and they’re not likely to submit it for such a study, since that would sabotage their new product, Molnupiravir.

Why wouldn’t they want to promote their own existing and currently FDA approved product if it works? My guess: Because it’s no longer patented, and other companies can make generic versions of it.

I’m only guessing about motives, and some may call me a “conspiracy theorists” for saying such a thing. But none of that erases the actual science. We can guess about motives all the live long day. But the science says Ivermec does what Molnupiravir does, but Ivermec is already KNOWN to be safe…

As far as Molnupiravir’s safety… we’ll get the typical, “Unknown… but the benefits outweigh the risks, cuz the only alternative is DEATH, so STFU you murderous bastards,” bullshit.

I’ve been struggling to understand why Merck would say Ivermec is “horse paste” and doesn’t work, unless it really doesn’t work, since it’s their own product… and why won’t they acknowledge that some Ivermec products ARE packaged for human consumption, and that there IS proof that it works as a PREP for RNA viruses. Now, I think I understand why, and that’s the only reason why I mention motives now.

Please bookmark this article to share, as proof, when you say that people are being made fun of for taking Ivermec when it does the same damn thing lord savior Pfizer’s miracle pills are supposed to do: austinpublishinggroup.com/pharmacology-t…

Please download this cohort study and share with your physicians… the largest and only PEER REVIEWED cohort study, testing the efficacy (highest dose and frequency needed to be safe and effective for long term use) of Ivermec as a prophylactic and PREP.

Prophylactic Role of Ivermectin in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Among Healthcare WorkersIntroduction Healthcare workers (HCWs) are vulnerable to getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Preventing HCWs from getting infected is a priority to mai…https://www.cureus.com/articles/64807-prophylactic-role-of-ivermectin-in-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2-infection-among-healthcare-workers#article-information-publication-history

Precaution: Please do not take Ivermec without medical supervision. In South Africa, people were buying it off the black market, taking it on their own, and ended up with liver damage because they weren’t taking it properly, or shouldn’t have been taking it to begin with because of other problems.

It is a form of chemotherapy… just keep that in mind when discussion your options with your physicians. There *are* risks for some people, and it’s up to you and your doctor to figure out if your personal situation makes those risks worth taking.

Take care. Love you guys!

Originally posted here on Twitter.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *